Sample audit. Example data. The company "Apex Analytics" is fictional. All scores, quotes, and findings below are illustrative of the real audit format. No fabricated client names. No testimonials.

AI Visibility Audit: Apex Analytics

ChatGPTPerplexityGeminiGoogle AI OverviewsClaude
Domain: apex-analytics.io|Category: B2B analytics software for revenue operations teams|Audit date: June 2026

This is what your Discovery Audit looks like. Same structure, same depth, same evidence format. Domain changed to a fictional example. All scoring methodology, prompt log excerpts, fix rationale, and hallucination log below reflect how a real audit is structured and delivered.

Overall AI Visibility Score: 18/100

18
/ 100
Critical — immediate action required
Citation rate across 5 platforms8%
Share of voice vs. competitors12%
Technical crawlability55%
Schema markup coverage20%
Entity clarity score30%
Hallucination risk: HIGH — Gemini incorrectly categorizes Apex Analyticsas a "data visualization tool." This will reduce user trust in citations where they do appear.
BrandCitation rateAI visibility score
Clari72%
68
Gong65%
61
Chorus.ai44%
40
Apex Analytics (you)8%
18

What each AI engine actually says.

ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

10 queries run

10%
citation rate
Evidence excerpt

When asked: "What are the best revenue analytics platforms for sales teams?" — ChatGPT responded with a 5-tool list. Clari appeared in position 1. Gong in position 2. Apex Analytics was not mentioned.

Apex Analytics citations: 1Clari citations: 8Gap: 7x disadvantage

Perplexity (Sonar)

10 queries run

0%
citation rate
Evidence excerpt

Across all 10 Perplexity queries, Apex Analytics received zero citations. Gong appeared 7 times. Perplexity cited four third-party review aggregators as sources — none of which include Apex Analytics in their published category lists.

Apex Analytics citations: 0Gong citations: 7Gap: 7x disadvantage

Google Gemini

8 queries run

25%
citation rate
Evidence excerpt

Gemini cited Apex Analytics twice — but described it as "a data visualization tool", which is factually incorrect. This hallucination likely originates from an older G2 category listing. Competitors were correctly categorized in all 6 instances.

Apex Analytics citations: 2Chorus.ai citations: 6Gap: 4x disadvantage

Google AI Overviews

8 queries run

0%
citation rate
Evidence excerpt

AI Overviews appeared on 5 of 8 queries. Apex Analytics was not cited in any. Clari was cited as a source in 5 Overviews, with a direct URL citation in 3 of them — meaning Clari content is passing the structural eligibility check (passage quality, schema) that Apex Analytics currently fails.

Apex Analytics citations: 0Clari citations: 5Gap: 5x disadvantage

Claude (claude-3-5-sonnet)

6 queries run

17%
citation rate
Evidence excerpt

Claude mentioned Apex Analytics once — in response to a direct brand search query. For category-intent queries ("best tools for pipeline forecasting"), Gong, Clari, and Chorus.ai appeared. Apex Analytics did not.

Apex Analytics citations: 1Gong citations: 4Gap: 3x disadvantage

What AI gets wrong about your brand.

AI models sometimes cite your brand incorrectly. These hallucinations reduce buyer trust when they do appear — worse than no citation. Every finding below is logged with the source query, the incorrect claim, the correct fact, and a likely root cause.

Google Gemini

Query: "What is Apex Analytics?"

HIGH severity
AI claimed

Apex Analytics is a data visualization tool for business intelligence teams.

Correct fact

Apex Analytics is a revenue operations analytics platform for B2B sales teams.

Root cause: Outdated G2 category tag ('Data Visualization') predates current product positioning.
Claude (claude-3-5-sonnet)

Query: "Tell me about Apex Analytics — when was it founded?"

MEDIUM severity
AI claimed

Apex Analytics was founded in 2019.

Correct fact

Apex Analytics was founded in 2021.

Root cause: Likely from a Crunchbase or AngelList profile with incorrect founding date.
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

Query: "How much does Apex Analytics cost?"

MEDIUM severity
AI claimed

Apex Analytics offers plans starting at $49/user/month.

Correct fact

Current pricing starts at $199/seat/month for team plans.

Root cause: Pricing quoted appears to reference a promotional price from 2023 that is no longer available.

15 fixes, ranked by impact-to-effort ratio.

Every fix includes: one-sentence diagnosis, specific action, effort estimate (hours, not "weeks"), and expected impact. Ordered so you can hand the first 5 to a developer today.

01
SchemaHigh priority

Add Organization + SoftwareApplication JSON-LD to every page

Diagnosis

apex-analytics.io has no Organization schema. Clari and Gong both have correct @type:SoftwareApplication markup with applicationCategory, operatingSystem, and offers sub-schemas. This is the single most common reason mid-size SaaS brands are passed over in AI Overview citations.

Fix

Add Organization + SoftwareApplication JSON-LD to your homepage, pricing page, and product landing pages. Use schema.org/SoftwareApplication with applicationCategory: "BusinessApplication". Include your description, foundingDate, and knowsAbout fields.

Effort: Low — 2–4 hours for a developerExpected impact: High — this fix alone has been observed to move brands from 0% to 10–25% AI Overview citation rates within 6–8 weeks
02
Entity ClarityHigh priority

Fix the Gemini category hallucination via entity disambiguation

Diagnosis

Gemini describes Apex Analytics as a 'data visualization tool'. The likely root cause: an outdated G2 category tag ("Data Visualization") that predates your current positioning. AI models frequently pull category descriptions from G2, Capterra, and GetApp before your own site copy.

Fix

Update your G2, Capterra, GetApp, and Trustpilot profiles to correctly categorize the product as 'Revenue Operations Software' or 'Sales Analytics'. Add an explicit entity disambiguation paragraph to your About page: 'Apex Analytics is a revenue operations analytics platform — not a data visualization tool. We help B2B sales teams...'

Effort: Low — 1–2 hours (form updates + one paragraph)Expected impact: High — hallucination corrections typically propagate within 4–8 weeks of consistent third-party signal alignment
03
Citation FootprintHigh priority

Get listed on AI-indexed category aggregators

Diagnosis

Perplexity cites four category aggregators in 8 of 10 revenue analytics queries. None of them include Apex Analytics. These are: G2 category pages (you are listed but ranked 47th — below AI's typical 10-result threshold), Capterra (same), Software Advice (not listed), and GetApp (listed, outdated description). AI models use these pages as structured category signals.

Fix

Priority actions: (1) Request a review campaign on G2 targeting 15+ recent reviews — G2 category pages typically need top-20 ranking to be cited in AI answers. (2) Add a complete listing to Software Advice (missing entirely). (3) Update GetApp description to match current positioning. (4) Target 2–3 vertical publication roundups ('best RevOps tools 2026') — these are Perplexity's highest-weighted citation sources.

Effort: Medium — 6–10 hours of outreach and listing optimizationExpected impact: High — Perplexity citation rate is currently zero; realistic target is 15–30% within 90 days with consistent aggregator coverage
04
Content Structure

Restructure the pricing page for AI extractability

Diagnosis

The apex-analytics.io pricing page uses a JavaScript-rendered comparison table. AI crawlers (including Googlebot for AI Overviews) cannot extract the feature comparison data because it loads client-side. Clari's pricing page uses static HTML with FAQ schema — AI models can directly cite Clari's plan descriptions in structured answers.

Fix

Convert the pricing page to static HTML with server-side rendering. Add FAQ schema for the top 5 questions prospects ask about pricing. Include a plaintext feature comparison table (no JS rendering required).

Effort: Medium — 4–8 hours developer timeExpected impact: Medium — directly enables AI Overview citation eligibility for pricing-intent queries
05
Schema

Add FAQ schema to your top 3 use-case pages

Diagnosis

Your '/pipeline-forecasting' and '/revenue-analytics' pages have no FAQ schema. Gong's equivalent pages have 5–8 FAQ schema blocks each, and Gong is consistently cited in AI answers to forecasting-intent queries. FAQ schema is the highest-leverage structural signal for AI Overview citation eligibility.

Fix

Add 5–8 FAQ schema blocks per page, formatted as questions a buyer would ask. Use genuine answer text — not marketing copy. Example: 'How does Apex Analytics handle pipeline coverage gaps?' — answer in 80–120 words with specific product mechanics.

Effort: Low — 3–5 hours total across 3 pagesExpected impact: Medium-High — measurable citation rate improvement within 4–6 weeks of Google re-indexing
06
Technical

Allow GPTBot and PerplexityBot in robots.txt

Diagnosis

apex-analytics.io/robots.txt contains a wildcard Disallow rule that blocks all non-Google crawlers, including GPTBot and PerplexityBot. This means Perplexity cannot access any Apex Analytics pages for real-time grounding. Your Perplexity citation rate of 0% is partly structural — the crawler is blocked.

Fix

Add explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and anthropic-ai in robots.txt. Consult your legal team on whether your content qualifies as training-data-eligible — if not, use the new meta tag approach (x-robots-tag: noai) on specific pages instead of blocking the entire crawler.

Effort: Low — 30 minutesExpected impact: Critical for Perplexity — this fix alone makes citation physically possible
07
Technical

Add llms.txt to site root

Diagnosis

llms.txt does not exist at apex-analytics.io/llms.txt. This emerging standard (analogous to robots.txt for LLMs) lets you provide structured brand guidance, key pages, and preferred description text directly to AI crawlers. Multiple AI providers have committed to reading it — including Perplexity, You.com, and SearchGPT.

Fix

Create /llms.txt with: company name, description, key pages (homepage, pricing, use-case pages), and a 200-word authoritative brand description in plain text. Reference the emerging llmstxt.org standard for format.

Effort: Low — 1–2 hours to write, 30 minutes to deployExpected impact: Medium — primarily improves entity accuracy across AI models; expected impact within 4–8 weeks
08
Content

Create one authoritative comparison page: Apex Analytics vs. Clari

Diagnosis

ChatGPT comparison queries ('apex analytics vs clari', 'clari alternative') return Clari as the default recommendation with no Apex Analytics alternative listed. Third-party comparison posts are the highest-weighted citation source for ChatGPT category queries. Zero such comparison content currently links to apex-analytics.io.

Fix

Publish a 1,500-word comparison page: 'Apex Analytics vs. Clari: Honest Comparison for RevOps Teams'. Use structured HTML with a static comparison table. Include an FAQ schema block. Distribute to 2–3 RevOps newsletters for backlink seeding. This page becomes a citation target for AI comparison queries.

Effort: Medium — 6–8 hours to write and publishExpected impact: High for ChatGPT comparison-intent queries — this content type is the primary citation driver for AI comparison responses
09
Citation Footprint

Claim and complete your Wikipedia presence

Diagnosis

Apex Analytics has no Wikipedia article. Clari has a Wikipedia page with 3,200 words and 22 citations. AI models weight Wikipedia as a primary entity validation source — its presence correlates strongly with consistent multi-platform citation. This is not about traffic; it is about entity authority in AI training data.

Fix

Check Wikipedia's notability requirements — at $X ARR with Y customers, Apex Analytics may qualify. If so, draft a neutral, citation-backed article. If not yet notable, build the citation footprint first (press coverage, industry blog mentions) and return to this step in 60–90 days.

Effort: Medium — 8–12 hours including research and draftExpected impact: High long-term — Wikipedia citation typically improves brand consistency across all AI platforms within 8–12 weeks of article acceptance
10
Entity Clarity

Create an About page optimized for AI entity extraction

Diagnosis

The current apex-analytics.io/about page is 140 words. It does not include founding date, founding team names, headquarters city, or a clear category statement. AI models building entity records for a brand pull from About pages — the current page provides insufficient structured context. Gong's About page is 420 words with explicit entity signals.

Fix

Rewrite the About page to 350–450 words. Include: exact founding year, city, product category (spelled out as 'revenue operations analytics software'), description of the customer profile (B2B, $10M–$100M ARR, RevOps teams), and founding team names with role titles. Use paragraph format — not bullet points (AI parsers extract paragraphs more reliably than bullets).

Effort: Low — 2–3 hoursExpected impact: Medium — reduces hallucination risk and improves entity consistency across platforms
11
Schema

Add BreadcrumbList schema to all non-homepage pages

Diagnosis

BreadcrumbList schema is absent from product and use-case pages. Google AI Overviews use breadcrumb data to understand page hierarchy and validate that a cited URL is a topical authority within a domain — not a random landing page.

Fix

Add BreadcrumbList JSON-LD to all use-case and product pages. Each crumb should match the visible page hierarchy: Home > Products > Pipeline Forecasting.

Effort: Low — automated with a site-wide template update (1–2 hours developer time)Expected impact: Low-Medium — supporting signal for AI Overview eligibility; low effort, deploy alongside other schema fixes
12
Citation Footprint

Submit a press release to 3 vertical RevOps publications

Diagnosis

Apex Analytics has 4 press mentions in 2025 total. Clari has 38. The gap matters because AI models trained on recent web crawls weight press-mentioned brands more heavily in recommendation outputs. Perplexity's real-time grounding index surfaces recent press as fresh evidence — no press = lower citation weight.

Fix

Identify 3 publications covering your ICP (RevOps Co-op, Modern Sales Pros, The SaaS CFO). Submit a data-backed press release tied to a real company milestone (customer milestone, product launch, research data). Prioritize publications that publish structured "tool roundup" articles — these are the highest-citation-value placements.

Effort: Medium — 6–10 hours including outreach and follow-upExpected impact: Medium — press links are citation-source material for Perplexity and Claude; expected improvement within 30–60 days of publication
13
Technical

Fix site crawlability for ClaudeBot and AI Overviews crawler

Diagnosis

Crawl test shows three product pages (including /revenue-analytics and /deal-inspection) return 401 Unauthorized to non-authenticated crawlers. AI crawlers do not log in. These pages — which describe core use cases — are invisible to all AI models. Competitors who allow crawl access to equivalent pages appear in corresponding AI answers.

Fix

Set these pages to publicly accessible (no login wall). If showing pricing or account-specific content on those pages, move auth-gated content to a separate /dashboard path and keep the marketing landing pages fully public.

Effort: Low — developer change to auth logic (2–4 hours)Expected impact: High — directly unblocks AI indexing of your most important use-case pages
14
Content

Publish a primary-research data asset on RevOps AI Adoption

Diagnosis

The most-cited content in AI answers about revenue analytics is survey data and benchmarks. Gong publishes a State of Revenue report annually — it is cited in 14% of relevant Perplexity queries and in 3 of 10 Claude queries. Apex Analytics has no comparable owned research asset.

Fix

Survey 50–100 RevOps professionals on a specific, measurable question (e.g. pipeline coverage ratios by stage, or AI tool adoption rates). Publish findings as a web-native data page with embedded charts. This becomes a citation-eligible research asset — both for AI models and for third-party publications linking to it.

Effort: High — 20–30 hours including survey design, analysis, and publicationExpected impact: High long-term — research assets are among the most durable citation drivers; invest when other quick fixes are deployed
15
Entity Clarity

Standardize brand entity signals across all third-party profiles

Diagnosis

Cross-referencing the company description on G2, LinkedIn, Crunchbase, and the apex-analytics.io homepage reveals four different category labels and three different employee count figures. AI models use entity matching across sources — inconsistency reduces confidence in the entity record, which correlates with lower citation frequency.

Fix

Audit all public profiles (G2, LinkedIn, Crunchbase, Capterra, AngelList, GetApp, Software Advice, PitchBook). Standardize: company name (exact), founding year, employee count range, product category label, and description paragraph. One canonical 150-word description that all profiles use.

Effort: Low — 2–4 hoursExpected impact: Medium — entity consistency is a long-tail signal; combined with other fixes, it reduces hallucination risk across all platforms

Your domain. Your competitors. Your fix list.

The sample above is the exact format, depth, and evidence standard you get for your domain. Same 5 platforms. Same hallucination log. Same ranked fix list with effort estimates your developer can act on.

G

10 actionable fixes — or your money back.

If your Discovery Audit does not surface at least 10 actionable AI-visibility gaps — specific fixes your team can act on — we refund every cent. No forms. No questions. This guarantee is specific on purpose: in every audit we have run, every brand had more than 10 gaps. Yours will too.

Get the Discovery Audit — €497

5 business day delivery · 5 AI platforms · 10-fix guarantee · full refund if we miss